Skip to main content

U. S. Government Agency Accused of Election Interference

An agency of the U.S. government, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), was accused today of meddling in its employee election for an employee representative on its pension board. The TVA Retirement System (TVARS) Election Committee formally requested TVA's Inspector General to intervene on behalf of TVA employees to stop the attempt to disqualify an employee candidate "after the employee election was underway, throwing the employee election in chaos."

TVA and the TVA Retiree Association, "neither of which represent employees, are seeking to change employee elections to deny employees their right to re-elect a long time TVARS board member who most employees know has served TVARS members well."

The election committee also asked for funding of independent counsel to review the rule change "passed Ex Post Facto" to "deny both the candidate and the nominating employee’s due process in the TVARS election and should be illegal based on the United States Constitution."

The committee "also recommends the TVA board veto this rule change and correct this bad governance before it takes effect. The committee "notes that until August first, the new election rules are still in a time window where they are subject to veto by the TVA board. TVA is in total control of the veto process."

"The committee notes that the new term limit rule was submitted and passed immediately in the board meeting" after the candidate "submitted a plan to the Board asking for support of an adequate, timely, best practice, GAO recommended, plan for requesting funding of TVARS by TVA which was denied. That motion identified that TVARS board members have specific liability in not proposing adequate funding of the plan. The timing of actions by TVA representatives to the board give the appearance of a TVA effort to resist adequate funding and of a punitive response to a funding plan request in a system which is inadequately funded. This rule appears to create a structural advantage to TVA through a black list for the strongest current and future employee representatives with financial and TVARS experience while maintaining TVA corporate resources in the background at TVA to control, manipulate, and reduce employee benefits."

Candidates are to be officially announced on August 8, with voting to begin August 20.

See the full text of the election committee's request to TVA's Inspector General here.

July 17, 2018 Update: Gay Henson, President of the Engineering Association, asked TVA to veto the "term limit" amendment. See the letter here. Thank you Gay!






Comments

  1. On July 17, 2018 the Engineering Association asked TVA to veto the "term limit" amendment. I added a link to the bottom of the above original post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Task Assigned to the TVARS Board

The TVARS board is required to recommend a contribution from TVA to be made in fiscal year 2014 prior to the end of the current fiscal year.  (See Section 9B on pages 51-53 of the rules here .)  Since TVA sets its budget months before the end of the fiscal year, it is imperative that this recommended amount be: decided upon by the TVARS board as quickly as possible; sufficient to adequately fund TVARS; and consistent with the amounts charged to ratepayers for pension expense. All seven TVARS board members have an obligation to come together to accomplish this.  (See TVARS board members here .)  I sincerely hope we will be able to accomplish this without further rule changes suspending TVA contributions, or further claims that legitimate accrued benefits are not really vested and must be reduced.  I hope we will be able to put an end to our failure to insure that amounts paid by TVA ratepayers for pension expense are used for their intended purpose.  As a TVARS board member, I

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out direct

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa