Skip to main content

TVARS Counter Offer Falls Short

A big thank you to everyone who wrote in opposition to President & CEO Bill Johnson’s proposal, and for the many suggestions for improvement.  You made a difference.  Many of our ideas were used to improve a counter offer which was passed 4-3 on March 3, 2016.  Though improved, I voted against this counter offer, and I remain firmly opposed to it.  These are some of my reasons:
  • It reduces benefits by approximately $700 million, almost as much as the original proposal.
  • It reduces vested COLA and supplemental benefits which members have earned the right to receive through their service as TVA employees.
  • It fails to bring the minimum TVA required contribution formula into line with best practices for government plans as recommended by our actuary.
  • It gives power to the TVARS Board to remove a board director for violation of policies created by the TVARS Board.

I first saw this counter offer the morning of the vote, though most of the items were previously discussed.  It was not shared with employees and retirees before the vote was called.  It currently exists only as a term sheet, without the detailed rule changes needed to implement it.  I do not know how President & CEO Bill Johnson will react.

These are some of the Improvements that were made to the counter offer:
  • The retention of the cash balance pension “as is” for pre-1996 cash balance employees.
  • The retention of half of a modified cash balance pension for post-1995 cash balance employees with more than 10 years of service.
  • A voluntary option for cash balance participants to switch their future participation to the 401(k) only plan.
  • Subject to IRS approval, a voluntary transfer from the cash balance pension to the 401(k) only plan.
  • A super-majority approval of the TVARS Board needed to change 401(k) plan contribution amounts.
  • A modest increase in TVA’s annual contribution commitment.
  • Removal of a term-limit provision which dictated that elected directors may serve only three terms.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa...
18 comments
Read more

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out di...
21 comments
Read more

Why isn't the TVARS board protecting TVARS members?

In order to protect TVARS members in the event the federal government divests TVA, the TVARS board can clarify in the TVARS rules that COLAs are vested benefits . (See support from Dennis To here .) Time is very critical now that TVA is working with President Obama’s administration on a financial review of TVA which includes the option of TVA being divested from the federal government. (See here .) TVARS could be terminated upon divestiture. It is very important that the TVARS board take steps to safe-guard benefits before this occurs. If system termination occurs while TVARS remains significantly underfunded, TVARS may never be able to achieve fully funded status. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in June 2012 to clarify that COLAs are vested benefits. Once again, I would be glad to forward any e-mails from you to the entire TVARS board. Please e-mail them to me at ljmuzyn@tva.gov .
20 comments
Read more