Skip to main content

TVARS Board Agrees: COLAs are Vested Benefits

The TVARS board filed documents with the court yesterday requesting that the Court grant Plaintiffs' Motion as to the vesting of COLAs.  The TVARS Board stated in the filing that the 2009 Amendments to the TVARS Rules reduced vested COLA benefits.  The TVARS Board stated that the Rules are ambiguous, but that the Rules' language and extrinsic evidence both show that all COLAs were and are vested benefits.  The TVARS Board also requested that the Court schedule a Conference to determine remedies if the Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion as to the vesting of COLAs.

See TVARS' Response to the two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the Plaintiffs and TVA here.  See TVARS' Statement of Additional Relevant Facts here. See the Declaration of Patrick D. Brackett here.  See TVARS' Response to TVA's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts here.  See TVARS' Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts here.

If the Court agrees that COLAs are vested, TVA would be much less likely to terminate our system.  Per Section 11B of the Rules, TVA is required to fund all vested benefits if our system is terminated. If TVA is directed by the Court to treat all COLAs as vested benefits, it would cost TVA at least an additional $1 billion to $2 billion more to terminate our system than under TVA's currently stated assumptions.

Below are some relevant excerpts from Section 11B of the Rules:

SECTION 11
B. Vested (Nonforfeitable) Benefits and Segregation of Funds

4. Upon any such discontinuance or reduction of TVA's contributions, steps shall be taken as described below:
a. Funds of the System sufficient to provide nonforfeitable benefits shall be segregated in the System's accounts…

b. In determining what amount is sufficient to provide such benefits, the board shall proceed on the basis of assumption approved by it following recommendations with respect thereto by the actuary, to the end that fully adequate funding (with such margins as the board considers appropriate) shall be provided for such nonforfeitable benefits, but that the balance available for disposition pursuant to section 11B2 or 11C2 shall not be unduly reduced thereby. In approving assumptions in this connection, the board shall give consideration to, among other factors, whether the System is being continued or terminated and whether and on what basis benefits will be available from another pension or benefit scheme of the Federal Government in lieu of those which would have been payable under the System had TVA not discontinued or reduced its contributions as aforesaid.

d. Notwithstanding any other provision of these Rules and Regulations, TVA will from time to time make such additional contributions when and as may be determined to be actuarially necessary to make up any insufficiency in the funds segregated pursuant to section 11B4a for the purpose described therein; provided, however, that if TVA determines that the insufficiency at the time of such discontinuance or reduction in TVA's contributions is too great to be funded immediately, TVA shall fund it through additional contributions over a reasonable period of time.

Comments

  1. Leonard, I think that was the best email I have received this year. Thank you for being such a great advocate for retirees. I don't think this would have come about except for your efforts. This should help our case greatly in the courts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Leonard, Thanks for your efforts on behalf of retirees. Would to God the rest of the Board members would put forth the effort that you have.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Task Assigned to the TVARS Board

The TVARS board is required to recommend a contribution from TVA to be made in fiscal year 2014 prior to the end of the current fiscal year.  (See Section 9B on pages 51-53 of the rules here .)  Since TVA sets its budget months before the end of the fiscal year, it is imperative that this recommended amount be: decided upon by the TVARS board as quickly as possible; sufficient to adequately fund TVARS; and consistent with the amounts charged to ratepayers for pension expense. All seven TVARS board members have an obligation to come together to accomplish this.  (See TVARS board members here .)  I sincerely hope we will be able to accomplish this without further rule changes suspending TVA contributions, or further claims that legitimate accrued benefits are not really vested and must be reduced.  I hope we will be able to put an end to our failure to insure that amounts paid by TVA ratepayers for pension expense are used for their intended purpose.  As a TVARS board member, I

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out direct

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa