Skip to main content

Congressman Mo Brooks Weighs In on TVA's Pension

December 2, 2014
Dear xxxxxxx:
Thank you for contacting me about the Tennessee Valley Authority's employee/retiree pension plans.
As I am sure you are aware, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was established in 1933 to "address a wide range of environmental, economic, and technological issues, including the delivery of low-cost electricity and the management of natural resources" to the people of Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.(1) As it currently stands, the TVA employs over 12,500 people, generates $10.8 billion in sales revenue, sells 162 billion kilowatts per hour (kwh) of electricity and receives no appropriated federal tax dollars.
Daniel Pitts, a TVA retiree, wrote an article for Pensions & Investments where he states that " the Tennessee Valley Authority's pension plan was only 63% funded at the end of its fiscal year September 30, 2013" and that "TVA expects to collect $528 million from its ratepayers in the current fiscal year, ending Sept. 30, 2014, to cover pension costs but plans to contribute only $250 million to the pension plan." Mr. Pitts avers that the TVA's "2013 funded status [for pension plans] is much worse than the 77% it was in 2008."(2)
It is my understanding that TVA pension plans are not protected or insured by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Pension Protection Act (PPA) and Internal Revenue Code requirements like many other utilities. I am astonished to hear of this news and I will follow-up with TVA leadership regarding this issue. I believe that TVA should fulfill their obligations to their employees and retirees when it comes to pensions.
Unlike many other pension plans, the TVA has the legal power to address any pension shortfall should it occur because the TVA has a monopoly over electricity and, in turn, can raise rates as necessary to fund its costs of generating electricity... which includes pension fund costs.
The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure has oversight over the Tennessee Valley Authority. Although I am not a member of this committee, please know that I will keep your views in mind should legislation regarding this issue come to the full House of Representatives for a vote.
Please feel free to contact me again in the future. You may wish to visit my website at http://brooks.house.gov/ for additional information about issues and legislation before Congress.
Sincerely,
Mo Brooks

Member of Congress

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Task Assigned to the TVARS Board

The TVARS board is required to recommend a contribution from TVA to be made in fiscal year 2014 prior to the end of the current fiscal year.  (See Section 9B on pages 51-53 of the rules here .)  Since TVA sets its budget months before the end of the fiscal year, it is imperative that this recommended amount be: decided upon by the TVARS board as quickly as possible; sufficient to adequately fund TVARS; and consistent with the amounts charged to ratepayers for pension expense. All seven TVARS board members have an obligation to come together to accomplish this.  (See TVARS board members here .)  I sincerely hope we will be able to accomplish this without further rule changes suspending TVA contributions, or further claims that legitimate accrued benefits are not really vested and must be reduced.  I hope we will be able to put an end to our failure to insure that amounts paid by TVA ratepayers for pension expense are used for their intended purpose.  As a TVARS board member, I
Post a Comment
Read more

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa
18 comments
Read more

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out direct
21 comments
Read more