Skip to main content

TVARS Board Approves Pension Funding Unfairly Subsidizing TVA

On August 8, 2016, the TVARS board passed by a 4-3 vote the actual amendments to the rules implementing the changes the board approved by the same 4-3 vote on May 9, 2016.  They will take effect in 30 days if not vetoed by TVA.  I stated the following during the meeting:

  • I will vote against these amendments.  I believe that all TVARS Board members have a duty to place the interests of TVARS, an independent government entity established in 1939 with the full support of previous TVA managements, above those of current TVA management.
  • These amendments will dramatically increase TVARS’ financial risk. TVARS now has just half of the funds it needs to meet its obligations to TVA employees.  These amendments do not provide a commitment from TVA to improve the funded status.  Instead, they reduce the minimum amount TVA is required to fund over the next twenty years to levels well below those required by law of other utilities.  TVARS will be subsidizing TVA, giving it an unfair advantage over competing utilities bound by ERISA pension law.  I can understand why current TVA management may find this desirable.  I do not understand why any TVARS board member finds this desirable.
  • I made a motion to table this vote until TVA employees and retirees are able to review them and provide comments.  Four members of the TVARS board already gave these amendments to TVA, and several of TVA’s comments have already been incorporated.  If the board wanted to do what is in the best interests of the retirement system instead of simply taking directives from current TVA management, I believe the board would have passed my motion to table.  The board did not pass my motion to table.

Click here to see the actual amendments.

Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 8, 2016 at 6:41 PM

    Leonard, you always make so much sense. Many times while working I had to deal with some outside comments about being lower cost because TVA was subsidized, but we were not. But you identify where TVA is not operating in the same market for labor (ERISA) and funding. We had an advantage in the reputation of our retirement structure. Thanks Leonard.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownAugust 9, 2016 at 7:23 AM

    It appears that a majority of the TVARS board are merely an extension of TVA management. Thanks for all of your efforts to stall or stop this attempt to deliver retirees a devastating blow.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa...
18 comments
Read more

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out di...
21 comments
Read more

Why isn't the TVARS board protecting TVARS members?

In order to protect TVARS members in the event the federal government divests TVA, the TVARS board can clarify in the TVARS rules that COLAs are vested benefits . (See support from Dennis To here .) Time is very critical now that TVA is working with President Obama’s administration on a financial review of TVA which includes the option of TVA being divested from the federal government. (See here .) TVARS could be terminated upon divestiture. It is very important that the TVARS board take steps to safe-guard benefits before this occurs. If system termination occurs while TVARS remains significantly underfunded, TVARS may never be able to achieve fully funded status. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in June 2012 to clarify that COLAs are vested benefits. Once again, I would be glad to forward any e-mails from you to the entire TVARS board. Please e-mail them to me at ljmuzyn@tva.gov .
20 comments
Read more