Skip to main content

Sixth Circuit Agrees with TVA: COLAs Not Vested

Click here to see the decision.

Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 12, 2016 at 10:12 PM

    Leonard, Can the TVA decide in the next 25 days to veto the Vested COLA benefit that they agreed to in principle last spring? Thus we lose the COLA going forward?
    Suzan Bowman

    ReplyDelete
  2. Leonard J. Muzyn, Jr., CFAAugust 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM

    Suzan - TVA can veto the rule amendments, but then nothing would change until the TVARS board passes different rule amendments that TVA wants. Changes to the rules must originate with the TVARS board. If TVA tries to go this route, they could come to Allen Stokes and you and attempt to convince you both what a great idea rule changes which eliminate COLAs would be. However, I strongly expect that rather than risk angering everyone with further COLA reductions at this time, they would instead try to slip in some different wording that would make it easier for them to cut COLAs again sometime in the future. In this case, they would most likely offer you some sweetener, or say that the amendments already passed hurt retirees in some way that needs to be corrected. Please be alert to this possibility.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownAugust 13, 2016 at 1:16 PM

    If TVA reneges on the COLA vesting, it seems all the other items agreed to and included in the negotiations would then be off the table.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Leonard J. Muzyn, Jr., CFAAugust 13, 2016 at 10:03 PM

    Dan - I agree that all the other terms and conditions should then be off the table. However, in addition to the points I raised in my reply to Suzan, TVA could threaten to terminate the system again if TVA does not get the changes they want. This bullying tactic has already worked twice - 2009 and 2016.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousAugust 14, 2016 at 8:45 PM

    I received an e-mail from SJ Bryson to make reservations for the 2016 TVA Retiree Appreciation Picnic hosted by TVA. I think TVA's actions on the pension, medicare supplement insurance and other issues make it clear how much TVA appreciates the retirees. I for one will not attend this hypocritical event and I hope my fellow retirees will boycott as well.
    Leonard, I appreciate your efforts to do the right thing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out di...
21 comments
Read more

Why isn't the TVARS board protecting TVARS members?

In order to protect TVARS members in the event the federal government divests TVA, the TVARS board can clarify in the TVARS rules that COLAs are vested benefits . (See support from Dennis To here .) Time is very critical now that TVA is working with President Obama’s administration on a financial review of TVA which includes the option of TVA being divested from the federal government. (See here .) TVARS could be terminated upon divestiture. It is very important that the TVARS board take steps to safe-guard benefits before this occurs. If system termination occurs while TVARS remains significantly underfunded, TVARS may never be able to achieve fully funded status. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in June 2012 to clarify that COLAs are vested benefits. Once again, I would be glad to forward any e-mails from you to the entire TVARS board. Please e-mail them to me at ljmuzyn@tva.gov .
20 comments
Read more

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa...
18 comments
Read more