Skip to main content

TVARS Board Blocks Vote on Financial Reform

I made the following motion at the June 15, 2017 TVA Retirement System (TVARS) Board meeting:

Whereas the TVARS Board wishes to amend its rules and regulations to meet the funding recommendations in the March 2017 GAO Report to Congress, the TVARS Board hereby approves amending the system’s rules and regulations to specify that the annual “accrued liability contribution” be determined using a fixed amortization period of 20 years beginning in fiscal year 2018 instead of the currently specified 30-year rolling amortization period.

I then stated the following in support of the motion:

This amendment would eliminate TVARS’ funding shortfall in 20 years. Per the GAO's report, 15 to 20 years is the maximum period recommended by a Blue Ribbon Panel commissioned by the Society of Actuaries. The GAO report indicates that TVA officials have stated a goal to fully fund the pension within 20 years, but that TVA has not identified such a goal or milestones in its performance plan or report. In contrast to TVA's stated goal, TVA officials told the GAO that TVA does not plan to contribute more than the TVARS Rules require. Without this proposed rule change, today's pension obligations would essentially be passed down to future generations of ratepayers. Current TVARS Rules require the use of a rolling 30-year period. This is analogous to refinancing your house with a new 30 year mortgage every year so that you never have to pay off the loan.

Jim Hovious seconded the motion.

A majority of the TVARS Board then proceeded to block the vote by passing a motion to table our motion. We were unable to guarantee a vote on our motion because our attempts to obtain support from a necessary third TVARS Board member were unsuccessful. Placing an item on the agenda as a voting item requires the support of three board members.


Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 16, 2017 at 10:08 AM

    You can bet they're getting theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rick TJune 16, 2017 at 3:50 PM

    I cannot understand how anyone on the RS board could vote against fixing the funding… Why would they not approve your motion ? Is it just politics w/ TVA ?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa...
18 comments
Read more

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out di...
21 comments
Read more

Why isn't the TVARS board protecting TVARS members?

In order to protect TVARS members in the event the federal government divests TVA, the TVARS board can clarify in the TVARS rules that COLAs are vested benefits . (See support from Dennis To here .) Time is very critical now that TVA is working with President Obama’s administration on a financial review of TVA which includes the option of TVA being divested from the federal government. (See here .) TVARS could be terminated upon divestiture. It is very important that the TVARS board take steps to safe-guard benefits before this occurs. If system termination occurs while TVARS remains significantly underfunded, TVARS may never be able to achieve fully funded status. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in June 2012 to clarify that COLAs are vested benefits. Once again, I would be glad to forward any e-mails from you to the entire TVARS board. Please e-mail them to me at ljmuzyn@tva.gov .
20 comments
Read more