Skip to main content

Muzyn Statement for Inclusion in TVARS May 9, 2016 Meeting Minutes

Our actuary expressed five key concerns with the funding policy in TVA’s April 18, 2016 proposal.  These concerns were included in a written report to TVARS and are applicable to what the board approved in the May 9, 2016 meeting.  Board members owe a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries of the system to act in their best interest independent of TVA.  Therefore, as a TVARS board member, I had no choice but to vote against this proposal.  This proposal may help TVA executives meet their goals and receive larger bonuses, but it exposes beneficiaries to these five very serious concerns.  I am ashamed to be associated with this board whose majority so clearly demonstrates that they place their own career advancements and financial securities above the duties required of them as members of this board.  This is a summary of the five key concerns expressed by our actuary about the proposal:

  • It is not clear if participants or TVA are bearing the investment risk if the return on risky assets does not meet the 7% expectation, but someone is bearing that several billion dollar risk.
  • There is a substantial risk that needed increases in the minimum contribution formula will not take place rapidly enough due to the continued 30-year rolling amortization of the unfunded liability.  Meaningful contributions to the plan would then be required at a time when few, if any, active participants remain in the plan.  Generational tension between plan participants and the then current TVA employees could occur to the extent future resources to pay both compensation and benefits are limited.
  • If TVA for whatever reason ceases to contribute and the plan has to be settled, there would not be enough assets to settle the plan’s obligations unless this occurs in the far distant future after many of the current participants have died.
  • By proposing a power of “review and agreement” over asset allocations, TVA limits TVARS’ ability to manage risks and participant benefit security.
  • It does not include any provisions to more rapidly fund the increase in the deficit related to making lump sum payments.  Offering to pay lump sums results in a faster depletion of fund assets and introduces additional volatility in contribution requirements which may not be easily recovered under current rules’ 30-year amortization.

Comments

  1. UnknownMay 12, 2016 at 11:11 PM

    I appreciate you standing your ground. Amidst all of the greed that goes into destroying a long time retirement system, it's good to have a representative, no matter how little your voice may or may not carry, who will say what needs to be said.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa...
18 comments
Read more

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out di...
21 comments
Read more

Why isn't the TVARS board protecting TVARS members?

In order to protect TVARS members in the event the federal government divests TVA, the TVARS board can clarify in the TVARS rules that COLAs are vested benefits . (See support from Dennis To here .) Time is very critical now that TVA is working with President Obama’s administration on a financial review of TVA which includes the option of TVA being divested from the federal government. (See here .) TVARS could be terminated upon divestiture. It is very important that the TVARS board take steps to safe-guard benefits before this occurs. If system termination occurs while TVARS remains significantly underfunded, TVARS may never be able to achieve fully funded status. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in June 2012 to clarify that COLAs are vested benefits. Once again, I would be glad to forward any e-mails from you to the entire TVARS board. Please e-mail them to me at ljmuzyn@tva.gov .
20 comments
Read more