I believe current TVARS board members who were on the board at the
time the following occurred still owe TVA employees and retirees answers to
the questions below. Jim Hovious was not on the board at the time the following occurred. Jim told me that he would have seconded the motions below and that he would not have voted to recommend TVA contribute only $285 million in 2014.
- Why
leave TVA employees and retirees vulnerable to further COLA benefit
reductions, and make it more difficult for their lawsuit to achieve a fair
settlement, by refusing to second the motion I made to clarify that the
COLAs are vested benefits?
- Why
refuse to second my motion to have open meetings where TVA employees and
retirees could observe?
- Why vote to maintain TVARS' poor financial condition and recommend TVA contribute only $285 million in 2014, thereby enabling the shifting of blame for the system's poor financial condition to the TVARS board, as well as the intensification of the pressure to further reduce benefits?
Sounds like someone has something to hide!! This is not right!! Thanks, Leonard for trying!! Keep up the good work!!
ReplyDeleteI agree that we are owed answers to these questions. Could you please post and/or send out the email addresses of the board members so employees and retirees can contact them? thanks
ReplyDelete