Skip to main content

Magnitude of the Under-Funded Status of TVA's Pension

It is important to keep the following in mind when evaluating the magnitude of the under-funded status of TVA's pension:
  • Using funded ratios from TVA’s 10-K statements is appropriate when comparing TVA’s pension to those of other utilities.  See TVA’s 2013 10-K here.  TVA’s 10-K statements show that TVA’s pension appears to be the worst funded of any corporate utility in the U.S., and the 4th worst funded of any U.S. corporation.  They show that TVA’s pension had a funded ratio of 59% at the end of fiscal year 2012, and 63% at the end of 2013.  TVA’s pension was $5.0 billion underfunded at the end of fiscal year 2012.  TVA’s pension was still $4.3 billion underfunded at the end of fiscal year 2013, even after a year of very good investment returns.  TVA’s OIG understands that numbers from the 10-K reports are the proper numbers to use in comparisons, and did so in their 2010 report on TVA’s pension risk.  See the OIG report here. 
  • Using funded ratios from TVARS annual reports to compare to other utilities is not appropriate.  The TVARS annual report shows a much higher funded ratio than TVA’s 10-K report.   TVARS reported a funded ratio of 79% in its 2012 annual report, and an underfunded amount of $1.9 billion.  See the 2012 TVARS annual report here.  (As of this writing, the 2013 TVARS annual report had not yet been released.)   TVARS uses an accounting standard which corporate utilities are not permitted to use in their 10-K statements.  This standard allows the future pension payments to be discounted to today’s dollars at the expected long-term rate of return of plan assets.  This produces a much lower present value of future pension payments.  This could make sense if TVARS was assured of a long future in which to earn its expected long-term rate of return, and was assured that TVA would make up any difference.  However, this is not how the benefits would be valued in today’s market.  In fact, if TVARS were terminated and the TVARS board searched for an insurance company to pay to take over benefit payments, that insurance company would price in a much lower expected return on assets.  It is likely that TVARS would have to pay even more than the underfunded amount produced using TVA’s 10-K data.  This was $4.3 billion at the end of fiscal year 2013.
Bottom line:  If someone tells you not to worry about the funding because it all depends on how you measure it, or to just use the numbers in the TVARS annual report which don’t show as high an underfunding, hold on to your wallet!

The graph below was developed using funded ratios from 10-K statements.  See the entire document I presented to the TVARS board here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why do TVARS board meetings remain closed?

Within the next couple of months, the TVARS board must vote on a contribution amount to recommend that TVA make in fiscal year 2014. In conjunction with the contribution amount, it is possible the vote will include amendments to the rules. In conjunction with the contribution amount in 2009, the rules were amended to: suspend contribution requirements and related actuarial valuations for four years (Section 9B9); suspend the requirement that part of the contribution go to the “excess COLA account,” which was designed to accumulate and grow funds to be used for payment of future COLAs (Sections 9B9, 10D1 and 10D2); and reduce legitimate accrued pension benefits (Sections 6I, 7L and 18C3). The vote in 2009 was not open to observation, and unless the TVARS board takes action, neither will the vote this year. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in December to open TVARS meetings to observation. All that is required to open future boa...
18 comments
Read more

Introduction

This is my personal blog to facilitate communication among TVA employees, retirees and beneficiaries who are members of TVARS and who wish to preserve their retirement benefits. Please join my site and post your comments.  I have been an elected member of the TVA Retirement System (TVARS, or the system) board of directors since 2003. I am not speaking officially for the TVARS board of directors or TVA management. TVARS is an entity legally independent of TVA. Three of the board members are TVA employees (including myself), three are appointed by TVA management (currently all TVA executive managers), and the seventh is generally a retired TVA employee (appointed by the other six). As TVA employees, we all have a duty of loyalty to carry out directives issued by TVA management in our regular TVA jobs. However, each board member has a fiduciary duty to all the members of the system when performing TVARS duties. This fiduciary duty legally supercedes our duty of loyalty to carry out di...
21 comments
Read more

Why isn't the TVARS board protecting TVARS members?

In order to protect TVARS members in the event the federal government divests TVA, the TVARS board can clarify in the TVARS rules that COLAs are vested benefits . (See support from Dennis To here .) Time is very critical now that TVA is working with President Obama’s administration on a financial review of TVA which includes the option of TVA being divested from the federal government. (See here .) TVARS could be terminated upon divestiture. It is very important that the TVARS board take steps to safe-guard benefits before this occurs. If system termination occurs while TVARS remains significantly underfunded, TVARS may never be able to achieve fully funded status. Not one of the six other TVARS board members would second the motion I made in June 2012 to clarify that COLAs are vested benefits. Once again, I would be glad to forward any e-mails from you to the entire TVARS board. Please e-mail them to me at ljmuzyn@tva.gov .
20 comments
Read more